INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE JUDICIAL TRENDS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : A CRITICALANALYSIS OF RIGHTS, EQUALITY, AND DEMOCRATIC VALUES IN RECENT CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS

INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW

INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE JUDICIAL TRENDS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : A CRITICALANALYSIS OF RIGHTS, EQUALITY, AND DEMOCRATIC VALUES IN RECENT CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS

INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE JUDICIAL TRENDS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : A CRITICALANALYSIS OF RIGHTS, EQUALITY, AND DEMOCRATIC VALUES IN RECENT CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS

AUTHOR – C NANMARAN* & R.NALINI CHANDRASEKAR**

* STUDENT AT SCHOOL OF LAW, VELS INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ADVANCED STUDIES (VISTAS)

** ASSISTANT PROFESSOR AT SCHOOL OF LAW, VELS INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ADVANCED STUDIES (VISTAS)

BEST CITATION – C NANMARAN & R.NALINI CHANDRASEKAR, INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE JUDICIAL TRENDS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA : A CRITICALANALYSIS OF RIGHTS, EQUALITY, AND DEMOCRATIC VALUES IN RECENT CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 6 (6) OF 2026, PG. 811-813, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344. DOI – https://doi.org/10.65393/IJLRV6I6485

1. Introduction

The development of constitutional law in India cannot be fully understood in isolation from international legal principles. In an increasingly interconnected world, constitutional courts frequently engage with global human rights standards to interpret domestic laws. The Supreme Court of India has consistently acknowledged the importance of international norms in shaping constitutional values, particularly in areas relating to human dignity, equality, and freedom.¹ Although India follows a dualist approach—where international treaties are not automatically enforceable unless incorporated into domestic law—the judiciary has often relied on international instruments to fill legislative gaps and strengthen the interpretation of fundamental rights. This approach reflects the Court’s recognition that constitutional values must align with universally accepted human rights principles.

While reliance on international law enhances rights protection, it also raises concerns regarding judicial overreach and the potential dilution of parliamentary sovereignty.