COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS JURISPRUDENECE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE INDIA

AUTHOR – SANTHANU Y & SHAKTHI M.S

STUDENTS AT B.COM LLB (HON’S), SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE IN LAW, TNDALU

BEST CITATION –SANTHANU Y & SHAKTHI M.S, COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE HUMAN RIGHTS JURISPRUDENECE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE INDIA, INDIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL REVIEW (IJLR), 6 (4) OF 2026, PG. 933-942, APIS – 3920 – 0001 & ISSN – 2583-2344

ABSTRACT

The human right jurisprudences of both the countries are differently inclined as the India human right jurisprudence rights has have been provided by the written constitution which have mandated the adherence that required to be implied the nation and in the aspect of the United Kingdom the adherences of the human rights jurisprudences are been provided by the statutes that have been provided upon and the common law and the universal mandate that provided in the European convention of the human right regulation that have been inscribed upon to the European union. The mandate which provided by the both countries are varied and legalization of the human right aspects have been provided with an ambit of the development of the jurisprudential aspects of the cases which are put forward to them and the ambit of the protection they provide to those victims which have suffered the consequence of these aspects. So, there would be requirements of the stronger legislation for these sorts of these jurisprudential aspects that have been happening in the nation.

Keywords: Human rights, Jurisprudence, Constitution, Statutes, Legislation, Europe, India